What the WHS Act 2011 Covers
The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 is the principal legislation governing workplace health and safety across most Australian jurisdictions. It replaced the patchwork of state-based occupational health and safety acts with a harmonised national framework. The Act establishes duties for persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs), officers, workers, and other persons at the workplace. It creates a tiered offence structure with penalties scaled to the seriousness of the breach, ranging from Category 3 offences for simple duty failures to Category 1 offences involving reckless conduct that exposes a person to the risk of death or serious injury.
The Act applies to all workplaces in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, the Northern Territory, the Australian Capital Territory, and at the Commonwealth level. Western Australia adopted the WHS Act in 2022 with some modifications. Victoria remains the only jurisdiction operating under its own Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004, although its duty framework is broadly similar. Understanding which version of the Act applies in your jurisdiction is essential because penalty amounts, specific provisions, and transitional arrangements vary between states.
Primary Duty of Care — Section 19
Section 19 of the WHS Act imposes the primary duty of care on every person conducting a business or undertaking. The duty requires a PCBU to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers who carry out work for the business and of other persons who may be affected by the work. This is a positive, proactive obligation — it requires the PCBU to take steps to identify hazards, assess risks, and implement controls before harm occurs, not merely react after an incident.
The standard of 'so far as is reasonably practicable' is defined in section 18 of the Act. It requires consideration of the likelihood of the hazard or risk occurring, the degree of harm that could result, what the person knows or ought reasonably to know about the hazard and ways of eliminating or minimising it, the availability and suitability of controls, and the cost of the controls (but only after assessing the extent of the risk and whether the cost is grossly disproportionate to the risk). This last factor means cost cannot be used as a blanket excuse for inaction — a PCBU must demonstrate that the expense of the control measure is grossly disproportionate to the risk, a very high threshold.
Officer Due Diligence — Section 27
Section 27 imposes a personal duty on officers of a PCBU to exercise due diligence to ensure the PCBU complies with its WHS duties. An officer includes a company director, a partner, or any person who participates in making decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of the business. This duty cannot be delegated. An officer who relies solely on safety managers to handle compliance without exercising personal oversight is exposed to prosecution.
Due diligence requires the officer to acquire and keep up to date with knowledge of WHS matters, understand the nature of the business operations and the hazards and risks associated with those operations, ensure the PCBU has appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise risks, ensure the PCBU has appropriate processes for receiving information about incidents and hazards and for responding to that information in a timely way, ensure the PCBU has and implements processes for complying with its WHS duties, and verify the provision and use of the resources and processes mentioned above. Officers face personal penalties of up to $690,000 for Category 2 offences under CPI-indexed amounts for 2025-26.